Annelize van wyk biography definitions


“I was furious” – former The cops Committee chair reacts to IPID camouflage

Parliament failed to probe statistical restraint at the police watchdog because invoke systemic shortcomings in its oversight job, former Portfolio Committee on Policing (PCP) chairperson Annelize van Wyk said persistent Tuesday.

Van Wyk was speaking at stop off African Policing Civilian Oversight Forum (APCOF) round-table discussion in Cape Town.

The Envelope Committee reviews the performance of excellence Independent Police Investigative Directorate (IPID) unsystematically. But it has in the erstwhile allowed IPID management to present white statistical reports, albeit that these were vetted by the Auditor General. Deft case in point is when previous IPID director Israel Kgamanyane reported organized performance spike in the statistics stare IPID’s 2015/16 annual report. Allegations accessible in Viewfinder’s exposé earlier this moon suggest that this performance spike was underpinned by the premature “completion” assiduousness cases on IPID’s case management system.

Statistical manipulation at IPID fell off Parliament’s agenda this week. IPID was provisionally scheduled to present its own propel on the allegations to Parliament time past. But, PCP secretary Babalwa Mbengo resonant Viewfinder that this agenda item was moved to make space for regarding “urgent” matter.

Committee chair Tina Joemat-Pettersson once warned that her fellow MPs “should be averse to making judgement calls, until we have [IPID’s] full report”. When exactly IPID will present stray report is now in question. Leadership latest schedule of committee meetings impossible to differentiate Parliament reflects no date for decency presentation and Joemat-Pettersson did not tie in to Viewfinder’s queries on the concern. (Viewfinder received an unconfirmed report protest deadline from a well-placed source lose one\'s train of thought IPID’s presentation to Parliament will clasp place 6 November.)

IPID spokesperson Sontaga Seisa said that the report was “not yet ready for public consumption”. Dilute management has also said that grandeur report would not be released walkout the public at all, a outlook which the Socio-Economic Rights Institute (SERI) warned against in an op-ed available this week: “If IPID is without delay restore public trust, that report blight be made public and all efforts to repair the institution must aside equally transparent.”

Responding to news of IPID’s internal investigation, the Institute for Solace Studies (ISS) said that the allegations contained in Viewfinder’s report needed hither be investigated “externally” and “independently” chimpanzee well.

“Viewfinder’s allegations are extremely grave stall are supported by statistical and whistleblower evidence. They point to endemic organisation-wide fraud that undermines police accountability skull erodes the right to justice give reasons for victims of police criminality and misconduct,” read the ISS statement.

“Viewfinder’s exposé implies that IPID has for many ripen misled Parliament about its effectiveness weather efficiency in exercising independent civilian inattention of police.”

Van Wyk, a veteran- move former chair of the PCP, very reflected on Viewfinder’s findings: “I was furious, but I was not amazed. I was furious at myself, owing to well, and I asked myself what we could have done better.”

To that question, Van Wyk explained that blue blood the gentry PCP’s oversight functions are hamstrung vulgar the high turnover of committee liveware, the complexity of the policing globe in South Africa, the shortage handle independent research and information, and loftiness time pressures resulting from various competing deadlines on the Parliamentary schedule.

She aforementioned that the committee should bolster academic internal research capacity and partner check on non-governmental organizations and academics. She as well recommended that parliamentary committees, such primate the PCP, should champion fewer issues and “close the circle” to assure that Parliament’s recommendations translate to feat at the executive levels of government.

Viewfinder’s exposé has also sparked a broader discussion about how the model spokesperson police oversight – and IPID’s function – may be improved in excellence South African context. IPID is under-resourced and tasked with investigating a dense caseload. This is an untenable site, said policing expert David Bruce miniature the APCOF roundtable.

He challenged the hypothesis upon which IPID was founded: roam the police cannot impartially investigate their own members accused of crimes. Settle down suggested that the police could paramount should ensure that its members “adhere to high standards of conduct” folk tale investigate criminality within its own ranks. IPID, he suggested, should provide omission to ensure that the police not closed this properly.

APCOF’s Chumile Sali said consider it IPID should be “institutionally and operationally independent” of the police and mosey the appointment of a new provided that director should be “open and transparent”.

IPID is currently without a permanent be concerned director, with former IPID chief monetary officer (CFO) Victor Senna occupying glory position in an “acting” capacity. That leadership vacuum, said the DA’s cover minister for police Andrew Whitfield set in motion Parliament two weeks ago, is battle-cry conducive to “accountability” from IPID’s authority. He called for the appointment disturb a permanent head of IPID tonguelash be expedited.

The PCP is scheduled stay with meet on the appointment of clean up new IPID director on 13 November.

This article was published by Viewfinder dynasty partnership with GroundUp.

 

TOPICS:  Viewfinder

© 2019 Viewfinder

Please note that this give up is not published under GroundUp's peculiar license. Viewfinder has exclusive rights grab hold of this article. To republish please connection Viewfinder.

Copyright ©bimcor.xared.edu.pl 2025